{"id":2104,"date":"2018-07-09T15:10:40","date_gmt":"2018-07-09T15:10:40","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-07-09T15:09:15","modified_gmt":"2018-07-09T15:09:15","slug":"supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/","title":{"rendered":"SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRAVEL BAN 3.0"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision has decided that President Donald Trump\u2019s Travel ban can stand. 7 countries will be effected by the travel ban and those countries being:<\/div>\n

Iran<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Libya<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

North Korea<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Somalia<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Syria<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Venezuela<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yemen<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The main questions that were presented to the Court were:<\/div>\n
1. Did the president exceed his authority?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
a. The government argued that on the basis of both the Constitution and immigration laws, the President is granted very broad authority to determine what is in the best interests of the country when it comes to determining who may \u201center\u201d the United States. The President decided what countries to include in the ban based on a \u201cworldwide review\u201d conducted by various government agencies to determine which countries provided adequate information to allow U.S. officials to make informed decisions about the admissibility of their citizens to the United States. The government argued that because the countries included in the ban did not provide adequate information, it was in the best interest of the United States to exclude them. The respondents argued that, in taking this action, the President was exceeding his authority because the ban was not temporary in nature, and it was inconsistent with the other parts of the INA and, thus, inconsistent with Congressional intent. Moreover, they argued, the President\u2019s undisputed authority with respect to immigration does not authorize him to undermine the whole statutory scheme of the INA.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
b. The Supreme Court held that the Proclamation was a matter \u201cwithin the core of executive responsibility\u201d and that, given the Administration\u2019s worldwide review process and the exemptions and waivers set forth in the Proclamation, it could \u201creasonably be understood to result from a justification independent of unconstitutional grounds.\u201d Justices Breyer and Kagan disagreed. The fact that the Administration is hardly applying the Proclamation\u2019s exemption and waiver system, they argued, supports \u201cthe claim that the Proclamation is a \u2018Muslim ban,\u2019 rather than a \u2018security-based\u2019 ban \u2026.\u201d In other words, the dissenters argued that the Administration\u2019s justification was not reasonable enough.<\/div>\n
2. Does the Travel Ban violate the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?<\/div>\n
a. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from favoring or choosing one religion over another. The respondents argued that President Trump\u2019s own statements indicated that the Proclamation, like its predecessors, was a discriminatory \u201cMuslim ban\u201d and that other reasons offered for the ban were mere pretexts. The government argued that because the ban rests on a reasonable determination made after a worldwide review, the Court cannot \u201clook behind the President\u2019s factual determination in search of pretext \u2026.\u201d The government pointed out that although many of the countries that are subject to the ban were Muslim-majority countries, the \u201cvast majority\u201d of Muslim-majority countries were not subject to the ban, indicating that the analysis really was based on those countries that did not provide adequate information to the United States or otherwise presented risk \u2015 thus satisfying the \u201cfacially legitimate and bona fide reason\u201d test that applies in this area of the law.<\/div>\n
b. The Supreme Court declined to rest solely on the \u201cfacially legitimate and bona fide reason\u201d test. It analyzed the Proclamation by applying rational basis review. The Court held that there was no need to look beyond the Proclamation\u2019s facial neutrality. In dissent, Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg emphasized that the United States was \u201cbuilt upon the promise of religious liberty\u201d and that the Court\u2019s decision \u201cfails to safeguard that fundamental principle.\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
If you need any type of Immigration services, do not hesitate to contact me, Hamzey Sobh, at 248-557-3645<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i>  306 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision has decided that President Donald Trump\u2019s Travel ban can stand. 7 countries will be effected by the travel ban and those countries being: Iran Libya North Korea Somalia Syria Venezuela Yemen The main questions that were presented to the Court were: 1. Did the president …<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i>  306 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":2017,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[44],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRAVEL BAN 3.0 | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision has decided that President Donald Trump\u2019s Travel ban can stand. 7 countries will be effected by the travel ban\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"googlebot\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"bingbot\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRAVEL BAN 3.0 | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision has decided that President Donald Trump\u2019s Travel ban can stand. 7 countries will be effected by the travel ban\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-09T15:10:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-09T15:09:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/0e4af9d92b404903b674276377301988.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"150\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"150\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/joumanakayrouz\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/joumana_kayrouz\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/law-offices-of-joumana-kayrouz-pllc\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/JoumanaKayrouz\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/joumanakayrouz\"],\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#logo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/joumanakayrouz.png\",\"width\":2175,\"height\":1110,\"caption\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#logo\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"description\":\"Personal Injury Lawyer\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/0e4af9d92b404903b674276377301988.jpg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":150},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/\",\"name\":\"SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRAVEL BAN 3.0 | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-09T15:10:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-09T15:09:15+00:00\",\"description\":\"The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision has decided that President Donald Trump\\u2019s Travel ban can stand. 7 countries will be effected by the travel ban\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#webpage\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRAVEL BAN 3.0\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-09T15:10:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-09T15:09:15+00:00\",\"commentCount\":0,\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#webpage\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#primaryimage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Immigration Blog\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/supreme-court-upholds-travel-ban-3-0\/#respond\"]}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2104"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2104\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2017"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}