{"id":2133,"date":"2018-05-12T03:02:22","date_gmt":"2018-05-12T03:02:22","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-05-12T02:57:09","modified_gmt":"2018-05-12T02:57:09","slug":"in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/","title":{"rendered":"In the Wake of Covenant – Shah v. State Farm"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
On May 8, 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals released an important published decision in\u00a0Jawad Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.,\u00a0_____ Mich. App.\u00a0_____ No. 340370. (May 8, 2018), which, for the moment at least, has cleared up\u00a0some\u00a0of the issues left unresolved in the wake of Covenant.\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In this new published decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals an injured party (Jawad Shah) and several intervening providers filed suit against State Farm for No-fault benefits.\u00a0 In relying on Roger Williams Ins. Co. v. Carrington, 43 Mich 252; 5 NW2d 303 (1880), the court of appeals concluded that “enforcing the anti-assignment clause in these circumstances to prohibit an assignment of an accrued claim after the loss has occurred is against Michigan public policy…” and also held that an individual cannot assign rights beyond those he has at the time an assignment is entered into, i.e., that the 1 year back rule will apply at the time the assignment is executed for those actions filed before the assignment is signed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
As background to the\u00a0Shah\u00a0decision, it’s worth remembering that on May 25, 2017, the Michigan Supreme Court released its decision in\u00a0Covenant Medical Center v State Farm, Docket No.152758 _____ Mich ____ (2017).\u00a0\u00a0In its decision, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that medical providers do not have an independent statutory right to file suit against a no-fault insurance carrier to recover payment of medical expenses incurred by their patients.\u00a0 During oral arguments, one of the supreme court justices frequently stated that the Providers could simply sue their patients to recover the balances, but left open assignments as an avenue of recovery.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But let’s step back for a moment and ask a simple question: Why does all this matter?\u00a0 Couldn’t the providers just give their bills to the injured party’s attorney like they did 20 years ago?\u00a0 Or alternatively, couldn’t they just sue the patient directly?\u00a0 The short answer is “yes,” of course they\u00a0could, but it seems axiomatic that if we assume these providers are (mostly) rational actors, given the fact that these providers had undertaken the decision to directly sue the insurance companies before the Covenant decision was released, they must have been seeing higher returns on their investment than when they attempted to collect from the insurance company indirectly, i.e. by suing the patient.\u00a0 Thus, presumably, these same providers likely believe that an assignment, when upheld, will function in much the same way as pre-covenant lawsuit, i.e. they will provide a higher recovery than if they try to recover directly from the patient. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
And this makes sense. Generally speaking, the No-fault act requires full payment of all reasonable and necessary claims related to a motor vehicle accident. And the no-fault act pays at a higher rate than Medicaid, Medicare, or Private health insurance.\u00a0 Further, collecting from an injured party’s attorney can be difficult as the provider may\u00a0have little or no bargaining power, and collecting from the patient is often even worse; the patient could easily be out of work and a mere stone’s throw from bankruptcy -something which can discharge all of their debt. No-fault insurers, on the other hand, are presumed to be quite financially sound.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
So, with providers having a strong incentive to increase their return on investments from their services to patients, and insurance companies having the strong and opposite incentive to prevent what they would call over-billing (or even fraud in some circumstances), the battles rages on in Michigan’s lower courts.\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In the immediate aftermath of Covenant, Defendant Insurance Companies across the state began\u00a0immediately\u00a0filing motions to dismiss provider suits for various reasons, in some cases arguing that Covenant completely barred\u00a0any\u00a0action by a provider. However, providers and their attorneys saw hope in footnote 40 of the\u00a0Covenant\u00a0decision, which stated:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

\u201cOur conclusion today is not intended to alter an insured’s ability to assign his or her right to past or presently due benefits to a healthcare provider.\u00a0“<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/div>\n
As a result, courts across the state were split into essentially two different camps.\u00a0 In one camp, those judges who believed the spirit of Covenant was more absolute, namely, that Providers lacked any standing to sue, and that assignments were entirely invalid regardless of the circumstances.\u00a0 Another, and seemingly larger camp, believed that assignments were valid (given the often cited footnote). However, that second camp was itself split in many different ways on how to handle assignments.\u00a0 Was an anti-assignment clause in an insurance contract valid? If so, was it valid against just the signatory to the contract or against every claimant to the policy?\u00a0 Was a suit filed before an assignment was procured protected for the purposes of a statute of limitations claim? Can one accident result in a cause of action being split into multiple claims or even in multiple courts?\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
With the\u00a0Shah\u00a0decision, at least some of those questions are now answered (at least until the court of appeals changes their mind or the supreme court weighs in again).\u00a0 Now, in the no-fault context\u00a0anti-assignment clauses are unenforceable as a matter of public policy.\u00a0 Additionally,\u00a0a provider won’t be able to protect their statute of limitations by filing suit and then later obtaining an assignment.\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But this doesn’t mean the arguments over assignments will end.\u00a0 An insurance company can still question the validity of an assignment.\u00a0 Is a signature valid? Does the patient have a guardian?\u00a0 Is the language of an assignment proper?\u00a0 Does it waive future benefits? Does it unequivocally give up the patient’s right to sue, or is it revocable?\u00a0 Can the patient and providers file multiple lawsuits in different courts as different causes of action, or must they all be combined into a single action in a single court? These questions must still be asked and will be answered in different ways by different courts.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Further, with the Shah decision based upon an 1880s\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0decision with a very different set of facts and a very different supreme court, you can almost guarantee State Farm won’t shy away from taking this decision to Michigan’s highest court.\u00a0 In essence,\u00a0nothing is certain in the long run.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But for now, at least, those providers which require every patient to sign these agreements will be pleased; and they will even more fervently pursue their bills against Michigan’s no-fault insurers.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
-John T Schroder<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i>  593 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On May 8, 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals released an important published decision in\u00a0Jawad Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.,\u00a0_____ Mich. App.\u00a0_____ No. 340370. (May 8, 2018), which, for the moment at least, has cleared up\u00a0some\u00a0of the issues left unresolved in the wake of Covenant.\u00a0\u00a0 In this new published decision by the …<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i>  593 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":2134,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[45],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nIn the Wake of Covenant - Shah v. State Farm | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"On May 8, 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals released an important published decision in\u00a0Jawad Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.,\u00a0_____ Mich.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"googlebot\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"bingbot\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In the Wake of Covenant - Shah v. State Farm | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On May 8, 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals released an important published decision in\u00a0Jawad Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.,\u00a0_____ Mich.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-12T03:02:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-12T02:57:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/204ccd_793b8e9772da4ea3a8fcffae4df718dd-mv2_d_4000_2670_s_4_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"150\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"150\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@joumanakayrouz\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/joumanakayrouz\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/joumana_kayrouz\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/law-offices-of-joumana-kayrouz-pllc\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/JoumanaKayrouz\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/joumanakayrouz\"],\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#logo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/joumanakayrouz.png\",\"width\":2175,\"height\":1110,\"caption\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#logo\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"description\":\"Personal Injury Lawyer\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/204ccd_793b8e9772da4ea3a8fcffae4df718dd-mv2_d_4000_2670_s_4_2.jpg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":150},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/\",\"name\":\"In the Wake of Covenant - Shah v. State Farm | The Law Offices of Joumana Kayrouz\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-12T03:02:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-12T02:57:09+00:00\",\"description\":\"On May 8, 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals released an important published decision in\\u00a0Jawad Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.,\\u00a0_____ Mich.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#webpage\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"In the Wake of Covenant – Shah v. State Farm\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-12T03:02:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-12T02:57:09+00:00\",\"commentCount\":0,\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#webpage\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#primaryimage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Personal Injury Blog\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/in-the-wake-of-covenant-shah-v-state-farm\/#respond\"]}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2133"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2133\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yourrights.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}